They just don't care

I'm sure most people outside the leftist bubble already know about this, but it bears frequent repetition:

The left just doesn't care about Americans in need of aid. Why? Because they are in a red state and not a pet cause of the left. But North Carolina is a state supposedly in play, so why not help out and get yourself some votes?  Does Kamala Harris already realizer she has lost the election and they don't even care about votes? Or is it even more sinister than that?

Former Obama senior adviser David Axelrod argued that Vice President Kamala Harris voters will be clever enough to navigate voting in the wake of the devastation from Hurricane Helene, while saying that rural Trump voters will have a harder time getting to the polls.

Axelrod made the claim during an episode of his podcast "Hacks on Tap" that aired Wednesday, predicting that liberal voters in Asheville, North Carolina – a predominantly blue area in the state – will "figure out a way to vote" more so than conservatives in the storm’s aftermath. 

Describing Asheville as a "blue dot" in the state, he continued, "Those voters in Asheville are – they’re, you know, the kind of voters that will figure out a way to vote. You know, they’re upscale, kind of liberal voters, and they’re probably going to figure out a way to vote," Axelrod said.

He continued, stating that rural conservatives may not be as resourceful in finding ways to vote following the destruction of their homes and communities.

"I’m not sure a bunch of these folks who’ve had their homes and lives destroyed elsewhere in western North Carolina – in the mountains there – are going to be as easy to wrangle for the Trump campaign," the political commentator hypothesized.

That's not just political opportunism, it's vile, sick and evil. 

Sunday verse

Conservative vs. Liberal priorities on display

Canada is an advanced microcosm of what would happen in America under Kamala Harris.  Canadian voters have come back to their senses, nary a moment too soon.  I hope American voters do so before it's too late:

This deserves a second post

....because it's so ridiculous. Stop gaslighting the American public!

Just...why, FEMA?

Illegal immigrants got all the money? Why FEMA, why?

3 on 1 and Vance still won the debate handily

The moderators were not moderating the debate they were supporting panicky Tim Walz and still JD Vance was able to kick butt in the debate.  It was brilliant.  When polling comes in I'm sure it will be a win for Vance.  I'm equally sure, though it won't be polled, Vance pointing this out further chipped away at the abysmal levels of trust for the mainstream media.

Unfortunately, I'm also sure this debate will do little to move the polling, as VP debates have only a small impact.  I would caveat that a little here; it might mean more than normal, but just not a lot more.

I'm shocked that the fairest debate this election cycle was conducted by CNN (not really). Debate moderators have become useless given that they are all so left-biased now. 

How about the questions are pre-packaged and displayed on a screen to the participants and microphones are automated to turn on and off at set times? No people involved whatsoever. Questions can come from sources proposed by candidates and accepted by their opponents. For example Vance could request 10 questions come from Fox and Walz could request 10 from CBS. The questions would be asked alternately between both sources.  Just a thought.